Tax rulings
Advance written confirmation from the cantonal authority on how a structure will be taxed, before you commit capital.
Tax rulingsThere is no single “Swiss tax rate”. The effective number is built from federal, cantonal and communal layers and moved by the reliefs that actually apply: the participation deduction, the patent box, R&D super-deduction, financing. We model the effective rate across cantons for your real figures, structure the reliefs that move it, and confirm the treatment with a ruling where it counts.
Canton, reliefs and substance, worked out for your actual numbers.
A Swiss company’s tax is built from three layers: federal corporate income tax at 8.5 percent, cantonal tax, and communal tax. The combined effective rate ranges from roughly 11 to 21 percent depending on where the company sits. Advisory work, grounded in the federal and cantonal tax framework, models that rate for your actual figures and finds the reliefs that lower it. The value is a real, defensible effective rate, not a headline.
The canton choice links to company formation, certainty to tax rulings, and cross-border structures to international tax structuring.
A headline cantonal rate is the starting point; the reliefs are what change the number that matters. Each has conditions, and each is worth modelling against your actual income.
| Relief | What it does | Condition |
|---|---|---|
| Participation deduction | Near-exempts qualifying dividends & gains | ≥10% or CHF 1m |
| Patent box | Cuts tax on patent income up to 90% (cantonal) | Qualifying IP |
| R&D super-deduction | Up to 150% of qualifying R&D expense | Cantonal, where offered |
| Canton & commune choice | Moves the base rate ~11–21% | Substance must fit |
The reliefs interact (and the cantonal cap means patent box and R&D together cannot zero out cantonal tax), so the real effect comes from modelling them on your specific income and expense, in the canton where your substance can sit. That modelling is the heart of the advisory.
The single biggest lever is where the company is seated. Combined federal, cantonal and communal corporate income tax spans roughly ten percentage points across Switzerland: the difference between a low-tax central canton and a high-tax city.
| Canton (seat) | Indicative combined rate | Band |
|---|---|---|
| Zug | ~11.8% | Lowest |
| Nidwalden | ~12.0% | Lowest |
| Lucerne | ~12.2% | Low |
| Geneva / Vaud | ~14.0% | Mid |
| Zurich | ~19.6% | High |
| Bern | ~20.5% | Highest |
A low rate only holds if the substance genuinely sits in the canton: a Zug letterbox over a business run from Zurich does not survive scrutiny. And the headline rate is not the whole picture: the Pillar Two minimum of 15 percent now claws back part of the advantage for large groups. We model the real after-relief, after-Pillar-Two rate for your figures, in a canton where your substance can actually live.
Advice is only useful when it reaches the return. We model, structure, confirm and implement, not just opine.
The combined federal, cantonal and communal rate across candidate cantons for your actual profit, with the reliefs applied.
Structuring participations, IP, R&D and financing so the reliefs qualify and the rate is achievable.
An advance cantonal ruling confirming the treatment in writing before capital is committed, where the position warrants it.
Embedding the plan through the formation, the accounting and the returns so the modelled rate is the one actually paid.
Revisiting the position as the business, the law and the substance evolve, including Pillar Two for groups that grow into scope.
Tax advisory is scoped to the work: a single-canton effective-rate model for a new company is lighter than a multi-canton group structuring with patent box, financing and a ruling. The value is measured against the tax it saves and the exposure it removes, not against an hourly figure.
We scope and quote against the structure and the cantons in play. Pricing is on request.
Discuss your positionA defensible effective rate rests on more than choosing a low canton:
Choosing a canton purely on its advertised rate is the most common tax mistake we correct. A rock-bottom rate is worth nothing if your substance cannot credibly sit there, if the reliefs you assumed do not qualify, or if a foreign authority or Pillar Two challenges a profit that has no matching activity. A slightly higher rate that is real, defensible and ruled-upon beats a headline number that collapses under scrutiny. We optimise the rate you will actually keep, not the one on the brochure.
Swiss tax planning joins cantonal rate competition, federal reliefs, treaty rules and substance. Modelling the real rate and implementing it through the entity is the fiduciary work this firm has done since 2007.
The effective rate built up across cantons for your actual profit and reliefs, so the figure you plan around is the one you will pay.
The treatment agreed in advance with the cantonal authority, turning a favourable position from interpretation into written certainty.
The plan aligned with substance and the Pillar Two and treaty rules, so the rate survives challenge rather than only the first return.
Advance written confirmation from the cantonal authority on how a structure will be taxed, before you commit capital.
Tax rulingsHolding, financing and IP structures using Swiss reliefs and the treaty network, with substance and transfer pricing that survive challenge.
International structuringChoosing the canton and form with the tax outcome in mind: the cheapest time to get it right.
Company formationTell us the structure and where it can operate. A partner models the effective rate across cantons, finds the reliefs that move the number, and confirms it with a ruling where it counts.