Over-indebtedness (Art. 725 CO)
The duties whose breach, above all delay, is what crystallises director liability in bankruptcy.
Over-indebtedness (Art. 725 CO)When a company cannot be saved, the company’s end is fixed, but the manner of it is not, and that is what determines the directors’ exposure and the creditors’ recovery. Bankruptcy is where the board’s conduct as the company failed is examined: a late filing, a preferential payment, a clawback-prone transaction can each crystallise personal liability. We guide the board through an orderly bankruptcy (timely filing, safe conduct, equal treatment of creditors, proper cooperation with the bankruptcy office) to protect the directors from avoidable liability.
Orderly bankruptcy, directors protected.
Bankruptcy (Konkurs) is the formal insolvency process under the debt-enforcement law for a company that cannot pay. A bankruptcy office takes control, realises the assets, and distributes them to creditors by statutory ranking, after which the company is dissolved. It is terminal, not rescue-oriented. It can be triggered by a creditor or by the board notifying the court on confirmed over-indebtedness under the Code of Obligations. Once unavoidable, the work is doing it properly and protecting the directors.
Bankruptcy is the terminal route from the over-indebtedness duties, the alternative to a composition moratorium, and distinct from solvent liquidation.
Once declared, the process is run by the bankruptcy office and the board’s role becomes cooperation, and managing its own exposure.
| Stage | What happens |
|---|---|
| Declaration | By creditor enforcement or board notification |
| Office takes control | Assets secured; board loses disposal |
| Realisation & ranking | Assets sold; creditors ranked in classes |
| Distribution | Proceeds paid by rank; company struck off |
The directors’ conduct before and during all this is what is examined: late filing, preferential payments and avoidable transactions are where liability crystallises. The board cannot change the company’s end, but it can ensure its own conduct is timely, equal-handed and documented. That is where we focus.
Ensure the filing is timely, advise on safe conduct, order the records, and cooperate properly, so the directors are defensible.
Understanding how proceedings are arising: creditor enforcement or the board’s notification duty.
Ensuring any notification is made promptly, since delay is the most common source of liability.
Guiding the board to treat creditors equally and avoid preferential or clawback-prone transactions.
Getting the books and records in order for handover and cooperating with the bankruptcy office.
Keeping the directors’ conduct defensible and documented, with specialists where liability is contested.
The advisory cost reflects the complexity of the company’s affairs and the directors’ exposure. Set against the personal liability that an unmanaged, disorderly bankruptcy can crystallise for directors, the cost of getting the conduct and the process right is modest — it is, in effect, protection.
We scope and quote against the situation. Pricing is on request.
Discuss the positionKeeping directors defensible through a bankruptcy rests on:
Directors often fear the bankruptcy itself, but the liability that catches them was usually created earlier: in the weeks of delay while the deficit deepened, the payment that favoured one creditor over the rest, the asset moved out cheaply as collapse loomed. Bankruptcy merely examines that conduct. A board that filed in time, treated creditors equally, kept its records and avoided suspect transactions is defensible even in failure; one that did the opposite is exposed regardless of how the bankruptcy itself proceeds. This is why advice in the distressed run-up matters more than anything done after declaration. We focus there, because that is where the avoidable damage is done.
Ensuring a timely filing, safe conduct, ordered records and proper cooperation (so an unavoidable bankruptcy is orderly and the directors defensible) is the work this firm does.
The notification made promptly rather than delayed, removing the most common source of director liability.
Creditors treated equally and clawback-prone transactions avoided, so the board’s conduct withstands examination.
Records in order and proper cooperation with the bankruptcy office: an orderly exit, not a damaging one.
The duties whose breach, above all delay, is what crystallises director liability in bankruptcy.
Over-indebtedness (Art. 725 CO)The rescue alternative to be pursued first where the company is genuinely viable.
Composition moratoriumSelling the viable business or assets before or during insolvency to preserve value.
Distressed M&ATell us the position honestly. A partner ensures the filing is timely, advises on safe conduct, and guides the board through — protecting the directors.